Castells, Manuel
The main idea in his trilogy is the dialectics between the so-called Net and Self.
The
Net refers to social networks of all kind, and in all levels, from
networks of nations, to networks of institutions and organizations, to
networks of groups, to networks of individuals. The power of the Net
refers to the growing of inter-relationships and increasing
interdepence in society and economy, and the consequent loss of
autonomy. Each entity in society is losing autonomy, becoming more and
more dependant on developments in other part of the network. Something
that happens in one part affects all the other parts.
The Self
refers to an increased concern with identity, again, of all kind and in
all levels, from national and religious identity, to gender, class and
minority identity, to the identity of groups and individuals. The power
of identity counter-balance the power of dominant networks. Although
the networking effect refers to an increasing inter-relation and
interdependency, what happens is that some networks prevail over
others. The dominant one is the global capitalist network, with
economically developed countries, multi-lateral trade and financial
institutions, transnational corporations, and the ruling and management
elite that oversees everything. It is true that the entities inside
this network are becoming more and more interdependent, but they as a
whole constitute a large network that excludes a great portion of
humankind. The excluded ones, too, are integrating in networks of
inter-relations, and becoming able to express their identities in a way
that affects other networks.
In this way, there is an complex
interplay between what is generically referred to as the Net and the
Self. There is the networking effect that forces entities to resign
their identity in order to participate in the network, but then there
is again the identity effect that puts different networks in conflict.
To Castells, it is this complex interplay that is molding the main
developments of the new society. Different networks have different
values, different goals, and different logic. But again, the networking
effect is putting them in contact and exposing intrinsic conflicts.
Minds
are the main source of economic value, but also the source of meaning,
leading to identity, and ultimately, to social behavior.
-- 05.5.2 --
The
Net rises from the dialectical interaction of social relations of
production and technological innovation accounting for development. The
modes of production have been guided by capitalism, with its
institutions for creating and distributing profits according to
competitive forces. The modes of development evolve from the
interaction between science and technology and businesses, and follow a
logic of its own. Technology neither only determines social development
nor is only an instrument of production. The interplay between
capitalism and technological innovation transformed both production and
technological development, in which new technology enhances production,
which in turn enhance technology.
The result was a global
informational economy, where global financing, development, production
and distribution happens on the basis of the generation and processing
of information. The network enterprise not only shift internal
hierarchies, but also change patterns of competition and cooperation
among institutions, becoming a system of means composed of the
intersection of many autonomous systems of goals. That is, a network of
players with different objectives, connected to the entreprise in order
to compete/cooperate to achieve those objectives. The restructuring of
corporations change the employment conditions, creating a new entity:
the networker and flextimer replaces the full-time employee.
The
Self stems from the identity building process, which according to
Castells, is itself a dynamic motor in forming society, not only an
effect of it. Identity building is the process of construction of
meaning, privileging some sources in detriment of others. He identifies
three types of identity:
- Legitimizing identity, introduced by the dominant institutions
- Resistance identity, produced by actors excluded from dominant processes
- Project identity, created proactively with the aim to transform society
Current
social change witnesses the waning of traditional identities and the
increasing articulation of new resistance (e.g. Mexico's zapatistas and
Japan's Aum Shinrikyo) and project (environmentalism, feminism, gay and
lesbian) ones. The classic legimizing identity, the nation state, is
losing power due to globalization: it faces tighter budgets and less
monetary control due to financial global markets, and bargain with
corporations, which seek advantageous economic and social environments
for its operations.
BibliographyCastells, M. 2000. The
Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. I: The Rise of the
Network Society. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers. (1st ed.:
1996).
Castells, M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture.
Vol. II: The Power of Identity. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Publishers. (1st ed.: 1997).
Castells, M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture.
Vol. III: End of Millenium. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell
Publishers. (1st ed.: 1998).
|